Nga Kor Ming 倪可敏 Pakatan Rakyat, DAP (Part 1,2,3) Ipoh 18-2-2009
Author: admin | Category: BlogNga Kor Ming 倪可敏 Pakatan Rakyat, DAP 怡保巴占“解散州会,还政于民”讲座会 Ceramah Bubarkan DUN, Pulangkan Hak Rakyat di Bercham, Ipoh 18-2-2009
Nga Kor Ming 倪可敏 Pakatan Rakyat, DAP 怡保巴占“解散州会,还政于民”讲座会 Ceramah Bubarkan DUN, Pulangkan Hak Rakyat di Bercham, Ipoh 18-2-2009
原任霹靂州行政議員倪可敏(左)要求國陣霹州政府在48小時內解散州議會,重新舉行州選舉,否則民聯將召開州緊急會議,動議宣判國陣政府不合法。右2:原任霹靂州高級行政議員拿督倪可漢。(圖:星洲日報)
(吉隆坡)霹靂州民聯政府要求國陣在48小時內解散霹靂州議會,還政於民及重新舉行選舉,否則民聯將召開州議會緊急會議,動議宣判國陣政府不合法。
原任霹靂州行政議員倪可敏今日(週一,2月23日)在國會走廊召開新聞發佈會說,民聯目前擁有28個議席,加上國陣6名州議員禁止進入州議會,民聯擁有十足把握通過動議宣判國陣政府不合法。
他說,州議會議長擁有絕對權利提出召開緊急會議。
指決定非民聯首選
他強調,這項決定不是民聯的首選,但為了捍衛民主,民聯不得不要求贊比里在48小時內解散州議會。
倪可敏強調,網上多項民調顯示,超過80%霹靂州選民希望解散州議會及重新選舉,讓霹靂州選民重新選出心目中的政府,這是解決憲政危機的最佳方法。
“一旦通過動議宣判國陣政府不合法,國陣將不允許動用所有政府資源及款項,這將造成國陣政府陷入癱瘓及行政停頓。”
危機造成外資止步
他形容霹靂州憲制危機造成外資止步和經濟低迷,如果國陣奉行民主就應該還政於民,那就不必面對勞民傷財的局面。
另一方面,針對霹靂州議會召開日期,倪可敏說,議長已在上週致函蘇丹殿下要求召開會議的日期,民聯希望在最短時間內召開州議會。
倪可敏調侃國陣須尋求英女皇律師協助以解決霹靂州憲制危機的做法,顯示巫統仍活在殖民地時代。
他指出,聯邦及州憲法明確闡明大馬不必依靠英國律師提供任何法律詮釋。
他說,霹靂州蘇丹殿下曾於1977年針對一起案件下判時表示,當面對所有憲制危機,最好的解決途徑就是票箱,讓人民重新投票、重振政府。
(霹靂‧美羅)行動黨週日(2月22日)晚上在美羅新村禮堂舉行“還政於民”座談會,場面非常熱烈,超過1000名村民出席聆聽民聯領袖發表演講。
這項於晚上8時舉行的座談會,較早時由行動黨的怡保西區國會議員古拉發表演講,接著由原任州務大臣拿督斯里莫哈末尼查發表演講;原任行政議員倪可敏與莫哈末賽魯丁稍後抵達現場,而發表演講,而獲得村民熱烈鼓掌。
倪可敏:霹人民盼重選舉
倪可敏表示,目前霹靂州人民一般上都希望解散州議會,重新舉行選舉,以還政於民。
他說,目前政治局勢的發展,或許是塞翁失馬,焉知非福,因為行動黨不管在何處主辦政治座談會,都獲得三大民族一齊出席,大家心連心,要求解散州議會。
他說,他們將向霹靂蘇丹殿下提呈備忘錄,以要求蘇丹殿下解散州議會。
莫哈末尼查演講時表示,目前三大種族的關係非常緊密,共同在一個屋簷下聆聽演講,種族之間的緊密關係,是國陣執政時期所不能達到的。
(霹靂‧實兆遠)行動黨週六(2月21日)舉辦的“解散州議會、還政予民”座談會,吸引了逾2000人出席。
行動黨霹靂州主席拿督倪可漢坦言,民聯目前非常擔心議長西華古瑪的人身安全,已通過各種方法保護他。
他說,許多人為了達到政治目的而不擇手段,民聯議員擔心有些人利用他人對付他們,因此必須小心提防。
倪可漢上週六出席班台行動黨在衛星園禮堂舉行的政治座談會,針對親巫統網站發表威脅西華古馬安全的文章一事,這麼發表看法。
行動黨國會領袖林吉祥演講時也說,此事不能等閒視之,警方必須確保西華古瑪和其家人的安全,他也希望西華古瑪本身小心為上。
除了林吉祥和倪可漢,民聯行政議員倪可敏、州議員黃家和、中央領袖劉鎮東及班台支會主林宗榮等都有在這場座談會上演講。
倪可敏:贊比里倘若不解散霹靂州議會,民聯便將採取進一步行動
(吉隆坡)霹霹原任州行政議員倪可敏今日(週一,2月23日)限定霹靂州務大臣贊比里於48小時解散州議會,以便進行重選,不然民聯將會採取進一步行動,包括通過召開緊急州議會會議,提出贊比里領導的州政府不合法的動議。
他表示,贊比里的州政府屆時將無法動用政府行政開銷,所有的公款也無法動用,州政府將因此陷入癱瘓和憲政危機。
他說,民聯有28名議員,國陣只有21人,民聯有優勢通過這項動議。
倪可敏也是太平區國會議員,他週一在國會走廊召開的記者會上表示,民聯不希望,也不願看到這個局面的出現,因此,唯一及最好的方案就是解散州議會,還政予民,讓240萬名霹靂州子民重新遴選他們心目中的政府。
霹州議長西華古瑪早前以贊比里和另外6名行政議員藐視州議會為由,宣佈禁止他們禁止州議會,分別長達18及16個月。
倪可敏表示,根據“獨立民調中心”的調查,有77%霹靂州子民要求解散州議會;而“當今大馬”的民調也顯示,有88%的選民持同樣意見。
他說,霹靂巫統代表律師遠赴英國會見英女皇律師,突顯巫統還活在英殖民時代。他們在遇到問題,就像小孩那樣哭著向媽媽求助。
他認為,大馬是一個獨立國家,擁有本身獨立的憲法,霹靂州本身也擁有足夠的州憲法。
他說,霹靂州蘇丹在出任法官時,曾於1977年審理的一起案件中,做出當出現憲政危機時,就讓選票箱來決定的裁決。
(怡保21日訊)「如果許月鳳人在香港,為何反貪委會不依照此線索追蹤調查,以還霹州選民一個交待!」
行動黨霹州秘書兼原任霹州民聯行政議員倪可敏左右開弓抨擊大馬反貪污委員會,在處理九洞州議員許月鳳和雪州大臣的投報調查工作上,持有雙重標準。
同時,他促請國家廉政委員會,針對有關事件介入調查及作出回應。
「如果盛傳許月鳳在香港,為何許氏不回來選區服務?為何不敢面對選民?她在香港有什麼私事或事務可處理?」
他炮轟大馬反貪污委員會未對該黨有關的投報作出調查,反而「雞蛋裡挑骨頭」,去調查雪州大臣疑使用公款購買46隻牛,卻不落力調查目前被盛傳人在香港的許月鳳蹤跡。
倪可敏今日受邀出席一項開幕儀式後,向媒體如此披露。
諷反貪委會主席
他表示,大馬反貪污委員會接獲數以千計的貪污醜聞事件的投報,包括來自該黨針對濫權和涉及貪污事項,如宜力500萬令吉的公園大廈轟然倒塌的事件、國防部購買潛水艇等嫌涉貪污案等的投報,至今卻依然石沉大海,未有下文。
他續說,惟該委員會卻對雪州務大臣購買46條牛只,不但甚感興趣,而且還稱擁有證據來起訴雪州大臣。
「大馬反貪污委員會早前揚言會改變,並媲美香港廉政署,但在雪州大臣事件上,卻顯示大馬反貪委會只會『雞蛋裡挑骨頭』。」
他更譏諷反貪委會主席拿督斯裡阿末賽益,是否因今年是「牛」年,所以對「牛」特別感興趣
他認為,原應保持中立的調查機構,如今卻淪為政府利用或打擊政見不同人士的工具,因此,他呼籲,國家廉政委員會應挺身而出,就有關的問題召見領導人作出介入及調查。
Nga Kor Ming 倪可敏 Pakatan Rakyat, DAP 怡保巴占“解散州会,还政于民”讲座会 Ceramah Bubarkan DUN, Pulangkan Hak Rakyat di Bercham, Ipoh 18-2-2009
IPOH: Former Perak executive councillor Nga Kor Ming said, following the ban of BN’s menteri besar and six executive councillors from the state assembly meetings for 18 and 12 months respectively, Pakatan would command a majority in the state assembly and could announce the recapture of the state administration anytime.
Nga, who is also DAP state secretary for Perak, said during an exclusive interview with Sin Chew Daily that according to the state constitution, any political party or alliance with a majority of seats in the state assembly could announce the establishment of a new state government.
“In the next state assembly meeting, Pakatan will have 28 representatives while BN only 21. Even if they include the three BN-friendly independents, Pakatan will still have the majority. Legally speaking, Pakatan can annouce the recapture of the state administration.”
State assembly to be dissolved
He said even if the state administration were to be recaptured, Pakatan would still opt to dissolve the state assembly, which is the most democratic and ideal solution.
He said even if Perak Sultan did not give his consent to the state assembly meeting, the state assembly would have been automatically dissolved after six months, i.e. 13 May, and fresh state elections be called.
Q: If the state assembly meeting is to be convened, will Pakatan table a non-confidence motion against Zambry?
Nga: According to the state constitution, the Speaker has the right to decide the seating of state assemblymen. When the state assembly meeting is convened, the Speaker will instruct BN’s state assemblymen to sit at the opposition side and Nizar will still be seated at the menteri besar seat.
Based on the seating arrangement, Pakatan will still be the ruling party while BN is the opposition. Therefore there is no need to table any no-confidence motion against Zambry and no votes need to be cast to decide who should be the menteri besar.
As Pakatan does not recognise BN as the legitimate state government, a possible consequence is that the state budget and any other motion tabled by BN will not be passed. Even if they want to replace the Speaker, the Speaker has the power to overrule the motion.
Q: If menteri besar Zambry and the six executive councillors defy the Speaker’s decision and attend the state assembly meeting, what will happen to them?
Nga: If they force their way into the state assembly meeting, it will be seen as an act of non-conformity to the law and open defiance of the Perak state assembly speaker’s decision.
The Speaker can exercise the power given to the committee of special privileges to initiate the next course of actions, including summoning Zambri and his people for another hearing and serving them with even harsher punishments such as freezing their salaries and allowances.
Q:: Will they be ordered to leave the meeting?
Nga: No, but they have lost their rights to vote on any motion tabled in the meeting. Any of the motions they table will also not be accepted.
Q:: Is banning the seven from the state assembly meeting a strategy for Pakatan to turn the tide?
Nga: I wouldn’t say we are sure to win, but this is a strategy that we can adopt. We do things based on the laws and everything is done within the confines of the Constitution. If democracy has its day in Perak, no political parties could hijack the right of the rakyat to pursue happiness.
Q:: What kind of counteraction will BN take?
Nga: They may declare a state of emergency in Perak. Besides, they may also file a lawsuit in the court to challenge the power of the Speaker.
But if they do so, they will be seen as in contempt of the state assembly, and will be summoned by the Speaker to attend a hearing.
Q:: If a snap election is called, what will happen if BN and Pakatan control almost equal number of seats again?
Nga: Currently Pakatan has only 28 seats, considered a government with very slim majority, which is not persuasive enough. But if fresh elections are called, a clear victor will be produced. In the worst case scenario, it’s 30 to 29.
As such, Pakatan earnestly hopes to dissolve the state assembly and requests the public to give Pakatan an opportunity to form a stronger state government with two-thirds majority. Even if any assemblyman defects again, the state administration will not be threatened, and the state government can map out any economic development masterplan for the state.
Q:: How big is Pakatan’s chance in the fresh state elections?
Nga: Polls show that more than 80% of non-Malays support Pakatan. Non-Malays make up 51% of the state’s total population.
As for the Malay community, after the BN takeover, Pakatan’s support level among the Malays has been steadily rising. Pakatan’s support level among the Malays stood at about 43% after last year’s general elections, and should be slightly above 50% by now.
If Pakatan could garner more than half of the Malay votes, coupled with the support from the majority of non-Malays in the state, to secure two-thirds majority is not something impossible.
Q: How is Pakatan’s candidate line-up in the coming state elections?
Nga: After the recent takeover by BN, Pakatan will field the original 28 state assemblymen in the coming state elections, as they have served only a portion of their tenure. They need to seek renewed mandate from the people with their performances in the past ten months.
If Pakatan wins the election, Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin will still be the menteri besar. As for the constituencies of the three defecting assemblymen–Jelapang, Changkat Jering and Behrang, we will field suitable candidates in the elections.
Q: Is Pakatan concerned that BN will continue to woo away Pakatan assemblymen?
Nga: I have full confidence towards the 28 Pakatan state assemblymen. BN continues to try to woo Pakatan assemblymen even after they have recaptured the state administration. Fortunately our assemblymen are firm and unwavering in their stands.
Q: Is the Speaker being protected now?
Nga: To be frank, we are concerned about his safety, and have arranged for volunteers to provide full protection.
I can’t tell you where he is now, but can assure you he is now at a safe location.
Q: Are you worried that the Speaker will also hop over to BN?
Nga: Even if the Speaker defects now, he cannot change the situation. A decision that has been announced by the Speaker can never be retracted. (Translated by DOMINIC LOH/Sin Chew Daily)

倪可敏(前排中)拿著州憲法說:憲法賦予西華古瑪權力禁止贊比里和行政議員出席州議會會議。前排左起:謝昂憑、林川興,右起:戴成銀、莫哈末賽丁,後排左起:黃家和、A西華、岑卓能,右起:曾敏凱、曾福仔、林碧霞。(圖:星洲日報)
(霹靂‧怡保)原任霹靂州行政議員倪可敏促請州務大臣拿督贊比里在48小時內,尋求解散州議會,以便重新舉行州選舉。
重新選舉解決憲制危機
倪可敏今日(週五,2月20日)與民聯州議員召開新聞發佈會時,吁請贊比里為了人民的利益和捍衛民主,解散州議會,以重新舉行選舉,解決憲制危機。
他說,目前唯一可解決憲制危機的方法就是解散州議會,重新舉行選舉,這是人民的意願,贊比裡應該保持君子風度,在最短時間內解散州議會,以免在政治危機拖延下,影響發展。
議長西華古瑪分別禁止贊比里和6名行政議員踏足州議會18個月和12個月後,倪可敏表示,目前在州義會裡,民聯和國陣議員的比率是28對21,民聯可根據法律宣佈組織政府,唯民聯不願這麼做,反而願意尋求人民的委托。
他說,贊比里和6名行政議員被禁足州議會後,國陣將不能在州議會裡提呈財政預算案,這將使州政府不能操作而癱瘓,並出現混亂局面,這是國陣造成的,國陣應該負起全責。
如果贊比里拒絕尋求解散州議會,倪可敏說,他們將策劃下一步行動,目前他們是根據州憲法行事。
針對原任州務大臣拿督斯里莫哈末尼查表示民聯將在下一次召開的州議會會議上投贊比里不信任票,倪可敏不排除這個可能性,唯這將交由議長宣佈。
西華身在安全之地
倪可敏說,目前西華古瑪身在安全之地,沒有人可以威脅到他,不需擔憂。
他說,民聯領袖都和西華保持聯絡,而且常見到他,只是在目前階段,需要為他提供保護。

(霹靂‧太平)行動黨太平區國會議員倪可敏強調,武吉干當國會補選是反映人民是否認同霹靂州政權易手的民調,因此這一役對民主是否勝利,起著舉足輕重效應。
他說,為了確保補選只許成功不許失敗,行動黨已成立一個以他為首的百人助選團,以負起這項重任。
“這個選區有37%的非巫裔選民,如果民聯落敗了,將會被巫統詮釋為人民接受拉攏州議員的奪權方式。”
倪可敏週日(2月15日)晚上在新聞發佈會上,懇請選民給民聯一個機會,以挽救岌岌可危的民主,不要讓多年來爭取得到的民主,在一夜之間枯萎。
他也指在州政府易主後,已接獲許多居民的投訴,指土地局不再處理永久地契的轉換事宜,此舉將導致民聯的許多利民政策胎死腹中。
他希望馬華州行政議員馬漢順及大臣顧問拿督鄭可揚,應確保惠民策施繼續推行,否則應該呈辭。
倪可敏也表示合法化非回教廟宇、只需1000令吉的宗教場所轉換費用等,都應該繼續進行,並遺憾千辛萬苦才成立的非回教事務局已遭終止,這對州內的非回教發展是非常不利的。
“2補選偏袒巫統”
選委會主席應呈辭
行動黨太平區國會議員倪可敏指選舉委員會偏袒巫統,選委會主席丹斯里阿都阿茲應呈辭。
他說,選委會宣佈武吉干當區國會補選時,曾表示長達近2個月的競選期,是為了要方便巫統進行準備,這已使選委會失去獨立性。
他在新聞發佈會上說:“此舉也導致選委會成了巫統的傀儡,使選委會失去公信力,因為選委會猶如球賽的裁判在球賽未開打之前,便先判決對方讓球。”
他也指阿都阿茲在這之前不批准霹靂州美冷及章吉遮令州議席縣空補選,有濫權之嫌。
行動黨向選委會投報
巫統在“武當”豎旗犯法
行動黨將向選委會投報,指巫統在選委會仍未宣佈武吉干當國會選區的補選日期時,便在道旁豎立國陣及巫統旗幟,觸犯1954年選舉罪行法令。
太平區國會議員倪可敏指出,由於巫統武吉干當區部在選舉前,已豎立旗幟,因此應該被取消參選資格。
他週日晚上在新聞發佈會上說:“巫統也在沒有向太平市議會申請准證下,在道旁豎立旗幟。”